No Progress in Weekly Unemployment Claims for Five Months

by Mike “Mish” Shedlock – Global Economic Trend Analysis

May 28, 2010

Weekly claims once again hover around 450,000 with the 4-week moving average rising a bit to 456,500 for months.

Weekly Claims Report

Please consider the Unemployment Weekly Claims Report for May 22, 2010.

In the week ending May 22, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 460,000, a decrease of 14,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 474,000. The 4-week moving average was 456,500, an increase of 2,250 from the previous week’s revised average of 454,250.

Unemployment Claims

 

The weekly claims numbers are volatile so it’s best to focus on the trend in the 4-week moving average.

4-Week Moving Average of Initial Claims

 

The 4-week moving average is still near the peak results of the last two recessions. It’s important to note those are raw numbers, not population adjusted. Nonetheless, the numbers do indicate broad weakness.

4-Week Moving Average of Initial Claims Since 2007

To be consistent with an economy adding jobs coming out of a recession, the number of claims needs to fall to the 400,000 level.

At some point employers will be as lean as they can get (and still stay in business). Yet, that does not mean businesses are about to go on a big hiring boom. Indeed, unless consumer spending picks up, they won’t.

Since December of 2009 the 4-week moving average of weekly claims has bounced around between 440,00 and 480,000 spending most of the time near 450,000.

Progress has hugely decelerated, at best. Stalled is a better word as the following chart shows.

4-Week Moving Average of Initial Claims Since October 2009

Since mid-December 2009 improvements in weekly claim numbers has essentially stalled.

Questions on the Weekly Claims vs. the Unemployment Rate

A question keeps popping up in emails: “How can we lose 400,000+ jobs a week and yet have the unemployment rate stay flat and the monthly jobs report show gains?”

The answer is the economy is very dynamic. People change jobs all the time. Note that from 1975 forward, the number of claims was generally above 300,000 a week, yet some months the economy added well over 250,000 jobs.

Also note that the monthly published unemployment rate is from a household survey, not a survey of payroll data from businesses. That is why the monthly “establishment survey” (a sampling of actual payroll data) is not always in alignment with changes in the unemployment rate. At economic turns the discrepancy can be wide.

Barring short term census effects, it may be quite some time before we weekly claims drop to 300,000 or net hiring exceeds +250,000.

Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. He writes for his global economics blog which typically has commentary every day of the week. Mish is also a contributing “professor” on Minyanville, a community site focused on economic and financial education

Posted by Rom on May 28, 2010 under Bond Chatter,Bond Gurus | | View Comments

U.S. Money Supply Plunges, Double Dip Near?

 by Rom Badilla, CFA – Bondsquawk.com

May 27, 2010

Milton Friedman must be turning in his grave as the Daily Telegraph reports that despite all of the federal stimulus, the U.S. Money Supply, M3 is contracting at an accelerated rate that matches the decline last seen since the Great Depression.

The M3 figures – which include broad range of bank accounts and are tracked by British and European monetarists for warning signals about the direction of the US economy a year or so in advance – began shrinking last summer. The pace has since quickened.

The stock of money fell from $14.2 trillion to $13.9 trillion in the three months to April, amounting to an annual rate of contraction of 9.6pc. The assets of insitutional money market funds fell at a 37pc rate, the sharpest drop ever.

“It’s frightening,” said Professor Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research. “The plunge in M3 has no precedent since the Great Depression. The dominant reason for this is that regulators across the world are pressing banks to raise capital asset ratios and to shrink their risk assets. This is why the US is not recovering properly,” he said.

Lawrence Summers, the White House economic advisor said that the U.S. needs to continue to support the economic recovery via another stimulus bill to the tune of $200 billion.  Addressing job growth and boosting output first before addressing the issue of the growing budget deficit should be the concern of U.S. lawmakers.  According to the article, Summers stated, “”We are nearly 8m jobs short of normal employment. For millions of Americans the economic emergency grinds on.”

The White House request is a tacit admission that the economy is already losing thrust and may stall later this year as stimulus from the original $800bn package starts to fade.

Recent data have been mixed. Durable goods orders jumped 2.9pc in April but house prices have been falling for several months and mortgage applications have dropped to a 13-year low. The ECRI leading index of US economic activity has been sliding continuously since its peak in October, suffering the steepest one-week drop ever recorded in mid-May.

Mr Summers acknowledged in a speech this week that the eurozone crisis had shone a spotlight on the dangers of spiralling public debt. He said deficit spending delays the day of reckoning and leaves the US at the mercy of foreign creditors. Ultimately, “failure begets failure” in fiscal policy as the logic of compound interest does its worst.

However, Mr Summers said it would be “pennywise and pound foolish” to skimp just as the kindling wood of recovery starts to catch fire. He said fiscal policy comes into its own at at time when the economy “faces a liquidity trap” and the Fed is constrained by zero interest rates.

If the U.S. is unable to spark significant job growth through future fiscal policies, an economic recovery may never get off the ground.  Stagnant growth coupled with downward pressures in price levels could result in the U.S. following the path of the Japanese who have been mired in the “Lost Decade” for close to 20 years now. Japan who has attempted to use fiscal measures as way to ignite growth now has a debt-to-GDP ratio of nearly 200 percent, tops in the world.

“Fiscal policy does not work. The US has just tried the biggest fiscal experiment in history and it has failed. What matters is the quantity of money and in extremis that can be increased easily by quantititave easing. If the Fed doesn’t act, a double-dip recession is a virtual certainty,” he [Mr Congdon] said.

Mr Congdon said the dominant voices in US policy-making – Nobel laureates Paul Krugman and Joe Stiglitz, as well as Mr Summers and Fed chair Ben Bernanke – are all Keynesians of different stripes who “despise traditional monetary theory and have a religious aversion to any mention of the quantity of money”. The great opus by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz – The Monetary History of the United States – has been left to gather dust.

Mr Bernanke no longer pays attention to the M3 data. The bank stopped publishing the data five years ago, deeming it too erratic to be of much use.

This may have been a serious error since double-digit growth of M3 during the US housing bubble gave clear warnings that the boom was out of control. The sudden slowdown in M3 in early to mid-2008 – just as the Fed raised rates – gave a second warning that the economy was about to go into a nosedive.

Mr Bernanke built his academic reputation on the study of the credit mechanism. This model offers a radically different theory for how the financial system works. While so-called “creditism” has become the new orthodoxy in US central banking, it has not yet been tested over time and may yet prove to be a misadventure.

With the collapse in the money supply, the threat of deflation as we have mentioned here on Bondsquawk a number of times is real and closer than most people think.  Core CPI is dangerously low with little buffer and will continue to decline as prices decline in face of light demand from consumers who are dealing with job uncertainty.  Furthermore, commodity prices are dropping along with markets that support it such as China and Australia.

The Daily Telegraph article warned against the mechanical interpretation of  the M3 measure of money supply.   Specifically, M3 could be declining due to people going out and purchasing stocks, bonds, properties, and other assets.

While possible, the data as suggested by Lipper is telling us that the money isn’t being spent on stocks or bonds.  The most recent data, which can serve as a general indication, shows that a total of $25.5 billion of outflows occurred in the week ending May 19 of which, $27.1 billion came from Money Market Funds.  Bond Funds received a light inflow of $1.9 billion while Stock Funds had an outflow of $0.3 billion.

The decline in the money supply probably isn’t headed to the real estate market as very few are predicting a run up in real estate for a very long time.  While the recent data on housing has been decent at best, much of the improvement in activity comes from federal tax incentives that expired recently.  Furthermore, both residential and commerical real estate pricesare showing some signs of weakness as of late which implies weak demand as evident by the recently released Moody’s and Case-Shiller data.

If we can rule out the aforementioned three assets, where did the money go exactly?  An unconventional answer is to present another question.  In this case, David Rosenberg, chief economist for Gluskin Sheff asked a bunch in his daily report, “Breakfast with Dave.”

After an 18-month period of unprecedented fiscal, monetary and bailout stimulus, it is completely legitimate to pose the question: why is the yield on the 5-year T-note sitting below 2%? (Not to mention a record low 0.769% two-year note yield at yesterday’s auction.) Is that consistent with a V-shaped reflationary recovery? And, wasn’t the Fed so convinced just a few months ago that the recovery was going to be entrenched enough to allow the central bank to start to shrink its pregnant balance sheet? If so, then why is it that since March, the Fed’s balance sheet has expanded a further $50 billion, and all with extra mortgage backed securities?

The answer to all of our questions is that the money supply is dropping for a reason.  The “recovery” isn’t real. The deflationary spiral may already be upon us. If not, it soon will.

Bond Market Recap – May 27, 2010

By Rom Badilla, CFA – Bondsquawk.com

May 27, 2010

U.S. Treasuries tumbled today after China, in response to yesterday’s Financial Times report, said it will continue to support investments in the European region. Treasuries reveresed its flight-to-quality course as yields soared, leg higher by the long end. The yield on the 10-Year spiked 17 basis points to 3.36 percent while the Long Bond reached a yield of 4.25 percent, a rise of 16 basis points. The 5-Year, which underperformed the rest of the maturity stack, increased 18 basis points to end today’s session at 2.20 percent. The yield on the 2-Year finished at 0.88 percent, an increase of 6 basis points.

10-Year Treasury Yield Intraday Chart

The spread on 2-Year interest rate swaps reversed course from earlier this week by declining 7 basis points to 40. The spread or yield differential between the yield on the fixed coupon component of interest rate swap contracts and U.S. Treasuries now matches levels seen late last week, offsetting the rise where spreads reached a recent high of 60 basis points. By this measure, counterparty risk is subsiding for now.

2-Year Interest Rate Swap Spreads - Historical Chart

The LIBOR-OIS spread was again unchanged on the day at 31 basis points.

Along with equities, corporate credit performed well as spreads tightened across the board. The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index which contain over four thousand investment grade issues declined 2 basis points to a spread of 202 over comparable maturity Treasuries. The High Yield Master Index closed at a spread of 688 basis points, a drop of 19.

Equities advanced and is displaying the “all-clear” sign as we head into the holiday weekend for the US. The S&P gained 3.3 percent to 1103.06 while the NASDAQ increased to 2277.68, a jump of 3.7 percent. The VIX dropped 15 percent to 29.68.

The Dollar Index dropped 1.0 percent to 86.232. The Euro rallied back again from the recent lows to 1.2362, a gain of 1.5 percent from the prior close. The British Pound increased 1.4 percent to 1.4582.

Credit Markets Under Pressure

May 27, 2010

According to a Bloomberg article, corporate bonds are under attack as investors punted lower rated credits as the European debt crisis intensified in recent weeks.

More than 17 percent of junk bonds yield at least 10 percentage points over Treasuries, up from 9.2 percent last month, Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Global High-Yield Index shows. The jump is the biggest since the distress ratio rose 11 percentage points in November 2008, two months after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed. Bonds of MGM Mirage and Freescale Semiconductor Inc. joined the list this month.

U.S. distressed bonds have lost 10 percent in May, according to the indexes, as credit markets seize up amid speculation Greece and other nations in Europe with rising budget deficits won’t be able to meet their debt payments. Junk bond sales plunged this month to the lowest level since March 2009, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

While corporate spreads have improved along with stocks and euro recently as we head into the holiday weekend, the bigger picture remains that investors are still concerned as performance has been fairly negative since last month.

Junk bonds globally have lost 4.4 percent in May, on pace for the first monthly decline in 15 months and the biggest drop since November 2008, Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes show. Investors pulled more than $1 billion from high-yield funds during the third week of May, after redeeming $2.1 billion the previous period, according to EPFR Global, a Cambridge, Massachusetts, research firm that tracks fund flows.

Investors are unloading risky assets on concern European governments won’t be able to coordinate a response to surging levels of debt from Greece to the U.K. Spain became the focus of the crisis this week as four of its savings banks said they plan to combine to form the nation’s fifth-largest financial group, while the Washington-based International Monetary Fund said the country’s financial industry “remains under pressure.”

These concerns are affecting bond issuance as corporations pull scheduled deals.

The market turmoil is curtailing companies’ efforts to borrow to help refinance $1.2 trillion of bonds and loans expected to come due through 2014, according to Bloomberg data. Speculative-grade companies have sold $7.55 billion of bonds globally this month, the least since March 2009, compared with $41.6 billion in April.

Saudi Basic Industries Corp., the world’s biggest petrochemicals maker, and Las Vegas-based Allegiant Travel Co. pulled bond deals this week, bringing the total to at least 21 borrowers that have postponed sales since April, Bloomberg data show.

While corporations wait for tighter spreads to issue bonds, keep in mind, as the article mentions, that one month doesn’t represent the entire environment.  It becomes an issue if the market is shutdown for a long period of time as is the case with Residential and Commerical securities which has not seen deal flow in a couple of years.  In the meantime, it requires watching.  It is certain that one month doesn’t represent a trend.  However, it certainly could signal the beginning of one.  Stay tuned.

Posted by Rom on under Bond Chatter | | View Comments

PIMCO’s Bill Gross Says It May Be Too Late For Greece and “Lookalikes”

May 27, 2010

From Pacific Investment Management Company’s June 2010 Investment Outlook, Bill Gross talks about the problems with carrying too much debt:

Debt will get you in trouble – on both sides of the dollar bill as Shakespeare wisely counseled long ago: Neither a lender nor a borrower be. That probably seems like a strange admonition coming from a guy who helps to lend $1 trillion of it – and I suppose it is. But there was a time back in 1968 when lending got me in lots of trouble – deep doo-doo, to tell you the truth – and I’ve regretted it ever since. I was a Naval officer back then, sailing between the Mekong Delta and Manila Bay. Strangely enough, it was in the Philippines, not Vietnam, where I lost my moral compass and ran aground. I started a shipboard replica of a “payday” lending company operating under the principle of “two will get you three.” Sailors in port were always short of cash and yours truly – engaged to be married and operating under a self-imposed one-beer, nine-o’clock curfew – was more than willing to extend them a hand. The “two gets you three” scheme sounded harmless enough, because, heck, what’s a buck between friends when you’re about to hit the beach and party hearty! Still, as the “payday” characterization connotes, the money was due only a few weeks down the road when we were back at sea and receivables could easily be collected. And the annualized yield, as most of us investor types can easily calculate, was well in excess of 1,000% annualized. Well, there’s usury and there’s grand larceny, and my payday-hayday scheme was clearly in the latter category. The amounts were small – paychecks were only a few hundred dollars – but 200 compounded into 300, which turned into 450, 675, 1,000 – well, you get the picture. It didn’t take too many ports of call before Uncle Sam’s next payday became the property of Uncle Bill, and I became the financial godfather of the USS Wish I’d Never Enlisted. Oh but loose lips sink ships, and it wasn’t too long before the authentic godfather – El Capitan – got wind of Ensign Gross’s growing fortune. Rather than cut himself in on the scheme, he did what every good captain would do. He made me give it all back and confined me to the ship for the rest of my tour. No beer, no sightseeing in Tokyo on the way back home. No nothing. Two got me three for awhile, but it eventually got me into a heap of trouble. Well deserved, I’d say, and I’ve learned my lesson. Never made a 1,000% loan since!

Read the Full Article

FT claims China Reviewing Euro Debt Holdings

May 26, 2010

According to a Financial Times report, China is reviewing its euro bond holdings in light of the sovereign debt crisis that is plaguing the European continent.

Representatives of China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or Safe, which manages the reserves under the country’s central bank, has been meeting with foreign bankers in Beijing in recent days to discuss the issue.

Safe, which holds an estimated $630bn of euro zone bonds in its reserves, has expressed concern about its exposure to the five so-called peripheral eurozone markets of Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

This news, which hasn’t been confirmed, sent shockwaves throughout the markets on Wednesday since this may signal a change in policy as China has been attempting to diversify away from U.S. government debt. The Euro plunged and approached recent lows after the release.  The Euro closed U.S. trading at 1.2178, a decline of 1.4 percent on the day.

A spokesman for Safe refused to comment. An estimated 70 per cent of China’s reserves are held in US dollar securities, but the composition and management of the funds controlled by Safe are regarded as state secrets.

However, analysts point out that Safe rarely cuts its existing holdings significantly as it has so much new money to invest every month.

Instead, it reduces the proportion of new investment it devotes to a particular asset, thereby reducing the weighting of that asset in its overall portfolio.

According to the latest figures announced by Safe, the country’s foreign exchange reserves totalled $2,447bn at the end of March, up $174bn in just six months.

It remains to be seen what the next steps will be for China assuming the report is legit. In the meantime, this fresh bit of news, true or not, does not bode well for the ailing currency and restore market confidence that the EU so desparately needs.  Furthermore, escalating concerns of contagion and its effect on the banking system could add more volatility to U.S. markets as well as those around the globe.

Read the Full Article by the Financial Times

Posted by Rom on May 26, 2010 under Bond Chatter | | View Comments

Bond Market Recap – May 26, 2010

By Rom Badilla, CFA – Bondsquawk.com

May 26, 2010

Sparked by the decline in the Euro, U.S. Treasuries rallied late in the day, partially offsetting losses from the early morning session. The yield on the 10-Year reached a intraday high of 3.26 before declining back down to close at 3.19 percent, an increase of 3 basis points from the Tuesday’s close. The yield on the 2-Year closed out the session at 0.81 percent, a jump of 6 basis points while the 5-Year increased 5 basis points to 2.02 percent. The yield on the Long Bond increased 4 basis points to 4.09 percent.

10-Year Treasury Yield Intraday Chart

The Treasury in the second of three auctions this week, sold of $40 billion of 5-Year notes today at an average yield of 2.13. Investor interest was somewhat lackluster given the low yields. Indirect bidders which include foreign central banks participated in only 40.6 percent of the sale versus an average of 48 percent from the last 10 auctions. The bid-to-cover ratio, which is a gauge of overall demand, came in at 2.71 which is better though since the average by that measure is at 2.57.

Spreads in the interest rate swap market appear to be on the mend for now. The spread on 2-Year interest rate swaps declined almost 5 basis points to 47, signaling easing banking pressures for now. The 5-Year spread declined 2 basis points to 34 while the spread on the 10-Year declined almost a basis point to 9.

The LIBOR-OIS spread eased slightly and ended at 30.68 basis points, a decline of three-quarters of a basis point.

The credit markets rebounded from yesterday’s underperformance. The BofA Merrill Lynch US Corporate Master Index tightened in 2 basis points to close at a spread over comparable Treasuries of 204. Similarly, the High Yield Master Index finished at 707 basis points, a decline of 17. The US Banking Index dropped 7 basis points to 276.

Stocks declined after spending much of the day in positive territory. The S&P declined 0.1 percent to 1067.95. The VIX increased by 1.2 percent to 35.02.

The Dollar Index increased again brushing up against recent highs. The index which is measured against the six major world currencies closed at 87.121, an increase of 0.4 percent. The Euro dropped near its most recent lows by declining 1.4 percent to 1.2178. The British Pound dropped 0.2 percent to 1.4387

Join Bondsquawk on Facebook

Posted by Rom on under Bond Chatter | | View Comments

Europe & Asia Could Derail Global Recovery

May 26, 2010

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said that the global economic recovery is showing signs of strength after a severe downturn according to The New York Times.

In its twice-yearly Economic Outlook, the O.E.C.D. raised its growth forecasts for the major economies: the United States, Europe and Japan. The rebound from last year’s downturn is being driven by an increase in trade, booming emerging markets, the continued support of government stimulus policies — now starting to be unwound — a housing market recovery in some countries and improved market conditions, the report said.

 

However, the recovery could be fragile and on uneven footing as the European debt crisis and bubble in asset prices in Asia pose risks to the global economic recovery.

At the same time, the shift in liquidity from developed markets to such places as China and India, and the weak fiscal position of the euro-area countries present risks, the report stressed.

“As activity gathers momentum, global imbalances are beginning to widen again,” it said, citing in particular the “magnitude of capital inflows in emerging-market economies and instability in sovereign debt markets.”

The recent debt crisis centered in Europe has “highlighted the need for the euro area to strengthen significantly its institutional and operational architecture to dissipate doubts about the long-term viability of the monetary union,” the O.E.C.D. said. “At a minimum, surveillance of domestic policies needs to be strengthened, taking on board broader competitiveness considerations.”

 

OECD chief economist, Pier Carlo Padoan suggested that European countries need to bring their deficits under control sooner rather than later pointing out that most of the recent policies will not go into effect until next year. Furthermore, Padoan suggested that deficits need to be addressed with growth policies that increase tax revenues, ie consumption related taxes, rather just direct higher taxes, which could curtail growth.

Padoan addresses China and their problems of an overheating economy due to recent spikes in prices.

Here, China can also play a role by allowing its currency to climb, Mr. Padoan said, describing such a move as “low hanging fruit” for the authorities. That, and lower interest rates, would help to offset rising inflation pressure in China and reduce the risk of an economic hard landing, after years of surging growth rates.

 

Read the Full Article

Posted by Rom on under Bond Chatter | | View Comments

Morning Market Update

May 26, 2010

U.S. Treasury yields are retracing from the lows as the market catches a breather for now. The 5-Year is currently at 2.06 percent, a jump higher of almost 9 basis points while the 10-Year is sitting pretty at 3.22 percent, an increase of 6 basis points.

The LIBOR-OIS measure is unchanged this morning and currently at 33 basis points.

The spread over Treasuries for interest rate swaps is lower, displaying quite a turnaround which implies easing bank pressures. The spread on 2-Year swaps is lower by 7 basis points to 44. The spread on the 5-Year is at 34 basis points, an decline of 3 while the 10-Year is tighter by a basis point to 8.

2-Year Interest Rate Swap Spread

Stocks are up with the S&P 500 at 1079.39.

While the markets here in the US appear calm, the currency across the Atlantic continues to tumble lower. The Euro is approaching its recent lows of 1.21 and is down a percent to 1.2222.

Posted by Rom on under Bond Chatter | | View Comments

Driving with the Rearview Mirror

By Rom Badilla, CFA – Bondsquawk.com

May 26, 2010

Equity volatility creates uncertainty which can shake investor’s confidence and widen spreads on corporate bonds. Also, rising borrowing costs could lower equity valuations. When we compare spreads and stock market volatility, it is evident that they go hand in hand and move in lock step together.

The correlation between the VIX and the Merrill Lynch High Yield Index is around 0.90 over a ten year period (A 1.00 correlation means the two move in lock-step in the same direction while a -1.00 means they move in opposite directions. A correlation of 0.00 means that they are practically unrelated).

Despite the high correlation, there has been at times divergence between the two. In August of 2008 for example, High Yield spreads spiked from the mid to high 700′s to the 810-830 range while the VIX hovered in the low 20′s and surprisingly declined into the high teens by late August. For that particular month, the average spread for High Yield was around 820 basis points while the average level of the VIX was 21. In hindsight, the debt markets were under significant duress as evident by wider spreads in the corporate bond markets and the funding markets (i.e. LIBOR-OIS and TED spread).

A few weeks later, the two converged as spreads spiked even higher while the VIX leaped as Lehman Brothers collapsed in mid-September.

Fast forward to today, there is another divergence but the two indices have flip-flopped (keep in mind though that volatility spiked due to debt concerns, exterior to the High Yield Index via the rise in risk in sovereign bonds). The VIX has spiked to extremely high levels due to the decline in the stock market. While High Yield has widened, the spread should be much wider given the level of volatility. This is evident through both a time series chart and using linear regression analysis (I’ll refrain from posting the latter in this article in order to keeps things simple and straightforward. For those interested, the regression is posted in the comments below).

BofA Merrill Lynch High Yield Master Index and CBOE S&P Volatility Index

The VIX is currently in the 30-35 range while the spread of the High Yield index is currently at 724. By using history as our guide and if we assume that the VIX stays at elevated levels (which is not unreasonable given the European debt crisis, Korea, high unemployment, etc), the spread could easily widen further by an additional 50-150 basis points. This would bring the two highly correlated measures back in line.

With the recent underperformance of High Yield, it is fairly easy to see the catalyst for further spread widening.

Performance for riskier assets have been abysmal month-to-date. The S&P 500 is down 9.9 percent for the month alone while High Yield is experiencing a similar fate. The spread on the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Index is wider by 163 basis points to 724 as of May 25. Hence, the index is down 4.6 percent as bond prices have declined as prices on Treasuries appreciated.

Investors are pulling their money out of high yield funds as risk aversion takes hold and as past performance dictates their forward decisions. This “driving with the rearview mirror” is evident based off of a Bloomberg report:

Redemptions from high-yield funds “topped $1 billion” in the third week of May, according to EPFR Global, a research firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that tracks fund flows. That followed $2.1 billion of redemptions a week earlier, according to EPFR.

As high yield mutual fund investors receive their month-end statements in the coming weeks, negative returns and dropping portfolio balances could force more redemptions, which in turn lead to more selling of fund holdings by portfolio managers. Ultimately, spreads gap higher as bond prices collapse due to selling pressures.

Time will tell if this will be the case or if investors keep their eyes on the road ahead as cooler heads prevail amid rising market uncertainty. Another alternative is that stocks regain their footing, which results in volatility subsiding and brings the relationship back in-line. In the meantime, credit and their equity counterparts both require monitoring in this context.

Posted by Rom on under Bond Chatter | Tags: , , , — | View Comments
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »